Friday, March 9, 2012
Saturday, January 21, 2012
大扫除之顿悟
手上布满灰尘的，是自己的过去
这些曾经在乎的，执着的，令我伤心的，让我引以为豪的
都已是过去。
伤心的回忆抑或是开心的回忆
如今的自己回顾过去的点滴都是同样的浅浅一笑
笑自己的傻劲，笑自己的执着
是的。
人生，执着些什么？
昨天的执着，只会成为今日的回忆。
开心的伤心的，都只会是它日的记忆。
一切，总会过去。
这些曾经在乎的，执着的，令我伤心的，让我引以为豪的
都已是过去。
伤心的回忆抑或是开心的回忆
如今的自己回顾过去的点滴都是同样的浅浅一笑
笑自己的傻劲，笑自己的执着
是的。
人生，执着些什么？
昨天的执着，只会成为今日的回忆。
开心的伤心的，都只会是它日的记忆。
一切，总会过去。
Saturday, December 31, 2011
2011
2011年的最后几分钟。
失眠了好几晚，只为了努力的想这一年的成就。
辩论比赛，不是亚军就是和人家分享季军，始终拿不到冠军；
课业，成绩一个学期不比一个学期。
没有了，我人生当中最重要的两项荣誉来源就只是这样。
又是个不值得留念的一年。
但是，这一年将会是未来回顾人生时的转折点，因为，我学会了——“肤浅”。
曾经说过，如果有一天，我真的可以混进身边这些圈子的话，那我就已经不是我。
这一年，在这个圈子里，
我，
学会喜欢这个圈子的喧闹，喜欢这一群人的吵吵闹闹；
学会为不好笑的事情大笑，说低俗的话语讨人喜好；
学会放下对时间的斤斤计较，牺牲时间和他人玩闹；
学会放下生命长远的目标，追求当下的喜好。
生活圈子宽了，竟成了今年最大的回报。
曾经以为这是成长的必要，但如今却经常思考，
迷失了原来的自己有什么值得骄傲。
失眠了好几晚，只为了努力的想这一年的成就。
辩论比赛，不是亚军就是和人家分享季军，始终拿不到冠军；
课业，成绩一个学期不比一个学期。
没有了，我人生当中最重要的两项荣誉来源就只是这样。
又是个不值得留念的一年。
但是，这一年将会是未来回顾人生时的转折点，因为，我学会了——“肤浅”。
曾经说过，如果有一天，我真的可以混进身边这些圈子的话，那我就已经不是我。
这一年，在这个圈子里，
我，
学会喜欢这个圈子的喧闹，喜欢这一群人的吵吵闹闹；
学会为不好笑的事情大笑，说低俗的话语讨人喜好；
学会放下对时间的斤斤计较，牺牲时间和他人玩闹；
学会放下生命长远的目标，追求当下的喜好。
生活圈子宽了，竟成了今年最大的回报。
曾经以为这是成长的必要，但如今却经常思考，
迷失了原来的自己有什么值得骄傲。
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Monday, November 21, 2011
Is this what you meant by 'critical thinking'?
I always wondering about this since the first day my lecturer emphasised on the need of 'critical thinking' in law students. What actually meant by that phrase? At first, I thought that when we argue something based on our very own reasoning, then we are thinking critically. However, after putting myself into this faculty which thinking critically is a necessary, the definition of 'critical thinking' seems to be contradictory to mine!
When I put my doubts on this point to the lecturer, the answer I got was that,
'it means you could not let the mainstream media to lead your reasoning', i.e. you are thinking critically when you object the governmental policies, ministries' statements and whatever the government says or the majority views. Put it in a simpler way, when government says 'yes' and the opposition parties say 'no', you must say 'no'; when the government says 'correct' and the opposition say 'wrong', you must say 'wrong'.
Somehow, I just feel like the government is not stupid, they are the people we vote into the parliament to protect our interests. The controvercy between their ideas and the opposition's arose is just because both parties consider the same object from different perspective.
But, sir, would I fail to become a student who you think are capable to think critically, when I argue for the government or agree with the mainstream argument?
When all the great thinkers, analysts, professors say 'the law is wrong', then I must agree with them in order to qualified myself to become a critical thinker?
Is this what you meant by 'critical thinking'?
When I put my doubts on this point to the lecturer, the answer I got was that,
'it means you could not let the mainstream media to lead your reasoning', i.e. you are thinking critically when you object the governmental policies, ministries' statements and whatever the government says or the majority views. Put it in a simpler way, when government says 'yes' and the opposition parties say 'no', you must say 'no'; when the government says 'correct' and the opposition say 'wrong', you must say 'wrong'.
Somehow, I just feel like the government is not stupid, they are the people we vote into the parliament to protect our interests. The controvercy between their ideas and the opposition's arose is just because both parties consider the same object from different perspective.
But, sir, would I fail to become a student who you think are capable to think critically, when I argue for the government or agree with the mainstream argument?
When all the great thinkers, analysts, professors say 'the law is wrong', then I must agree with them in order to qualified myself to become a critical thinker?
Is this what you meant by 'critical thinking'?
Friday, November 18, 2011
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)